Touche. That makes sense, but as you have stated, there is certainly some ambiguity in the rules as written. Good to know that I have misinterpreted that point.
That said, I do believe that the rules as intended should allow Player A to freely adopt new members into an alliance without the consent of any former (non-current) member of that alliance - founder or otherwise.
Good times.
That said, I do believe that the rules as intended should allow Player A to freely adopt new members into an alliance without the consent of any former (non-current) member of that alliance - founder or otherwise.
Good times.