by Mr Suplex
galfridus wrote:
Mr Suplex wrote:
Dulkal wrote:
I think that is it for this discussion.
I'm just ignoring the idiots who don't want to take this seriously and who are coming up with ridiculous and irrelevant comparisons to the issue Viper and I have raised.
Clearly enough people see where we are coming from to have a worthwhile discussion. Thank you for being one of the grown ups here.
I was using logic to analyze your position. If all wins are equal, then everyone winning is the same as two people winning. If that seems ridiculous, then maybe the number of people involved in the win makes a difference!
No, your "logic" is dealing in absolutes, and really has no relevance to the discussion the adults in this thread are trying to have. You and that other guy are making fun of the position by comparing it to communism, talking about games where all players form an alliance for a win, 1000 player games, etc. Don't act like you are not being condescending.